Bank Fraud, codified in 18 U.S.C. 1344, is one of many types of fraud criminalized by the federal government. Bank fraud specifically targets any scheme or artifice to defraud a financial institution, including banks and credit unions. The government often uses bank fraud to charge individuals for passing fake checks (check-kiting), mortgage fraud, fraudulent loans, and many other types of conduct that involve lies or deceit to obtain money or property. Bank fraud is often charged in conjunction with wire and/or mail fraud.
Breeding Carter has effectively represented clients facing bank frauds of all kinds. We have defended individuals in cases involving false loan applications, mortgage frauds, passing fake checks, and other types of bank fraud. In some instances we have obtained deferred prosecutions or probation. We are well equipped to review your case, investigate the government’s claims and mount a defense to all kinds of bank fraud schemes.
18 U.S.C. 1344
The bank fraud statute is very short. Despite its’ brevity, it is a very broad statute that encompasses a multitude of criminal acts. 18 U.S.C. 1344 states simply that:
Whoever knowingly executes, or attempts to execute, a scheme or artifice-
(1) to defraud a financial institution; or
(2) to obtain any of the moneys, funds, credits, assets, securities, or other property owned by, or under the custody or control of, a financial institution, by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, or promises;
shall be fined not more than $1,000,000 or imprisoned not more than 30 years, or both.
The concise language and lack of limitations allows the government to apply it to many types of activity that are not specifically defined. It is important to remember that the “financial institution” must be a federal chartered or insured institution. However, banks that are not themselves federally chartered or insured, but are the subsidiary of the issuing institution or substantially involved in the transaction, may also qualify as a financial institution under this statute.
The most hotly contested issue in many fraud cases is the definition of a “scheme to defraud.” Courts around the country have issued hundreds of opinions on the definition of scheme to defraud, but the Second Circuit summed it up saying:
“Scheme to defraud” within bank fraud statute is not capable of precise definition but is measured in particular case by determining whether scheme demonstrated departure from fundamental honesty, moral uprightness, or fair play and candid dealings in the general life of the community.
U.S. v. Ragosta, C.A.2 (Vt.) 1992, 970 F.2d 1085.
Because no precise definition exists, the government oversteps their bounds in some instances and charge conduct that does not qualify. Additionally, the information used during the scheme must be material to the transaction. Immaterial representations, even if false, do not meet the standard for conviction.
Check-kiting is a specific type of bank fraud that involves the use of checks to withdraw money when insufficient funds exist to back the checks. The Second Circuit has described a check-kiting scheme as “embellished” where:
Defendant committed “embellished” check-kiting, so as to be subject to prosecution under section of bank fraud statute prohibiting schemes or artifices to obtain money of financial institution by false or fraudulent pretenses or representations, where he concealed control over account in one bank from another bank by using checks signed by another person and by having his employees make deposits into account, he carefully coordinated deposits to conceal number and amount of daily deposit, he discussed state of his accounts with branch managers of banks and assured them that overdrafts were inadvertent and any problems would be corrected, and he falsely alleged that he would obtain loan to remedy overdrafts.
U.S. v. Burnett, C.A.2 (N.Y.) 1993, 10 F.3d 74.
But, the Fifth Circuit has said that check-kiting is not an automatic when there are insufficient funds to back a check deposit:
Defendant who had engaged in check kiting scheme by depositing a series of checks, which were not backed by sufficient funds, in various federally insured banks did not violate criminal statute prohibiting obtaining of money from federally insured financial institution by means of false or fraudulent pretenses or representations; mere depositing of check was not of itself representation that bank account on which it was drawn had a sufficient balance to cover check.
U.S. v. Medeles, C.A.5 (Tex.) 1990, 916 F.2d 195.
The point is that bank fraud is almost never a given. There is room to litigate whether a person’s conduct constitutes bank fraud. That is why it is so important to seek out an experienced federal criminal defense attorney to assist you in fighting the charges against you.
A violation of the bank fraud statute carries a maximum penalty of 30 years in prison, a fine of up to one million dollars, a period of supervised release, and a one hundred dollar special assessment. A person convicted of bank fraud must also pay restitution and is subject to forfeiture.
How We Can Help
The federal criminal defense lawyers at Breeding Carter can help you fight bank fraud charges. Our firm has handled many kinds of bank fraud cases, understand how to review the documents involved, and we have access to forensic accountant experts and former FBI agents who can assist us in breaking down a case. We will discuss the conduct the government alleges against you, develop an aggressive, strategic plan to fight back, and put together a team of talented attorneys and experts to defend you. Call our Knoxville attorneys anytime at 865-670-8535 to learn how we can help you.